By now, you already know way too much about the Kermit Gosnell horror story—and you heard about it from conservative blogs, Twitter, and Facebook. You certainly have seen or heard little coverage from the MSM.

Let us be certain—they are intentionally blacking out the story, using a variety of deceptive explanations, non-answers, and look-over-there runaway schemes.

And why shouldn’t the major media outlets black out the story? The Kermit Gosnell trial is utterly devastating to abortion supporters on the Left. In a world where we have been assured abortions are safe, legal, and rare, we learned that Gosnell was not only a cold-blooded monster (who still complains he does not understand all the charges against him), but that this might be par for the course. Good rumor has it that another abortion clinic a short distance away from Gosnell’s might harbor additional horrors.

The Left has no defense for this without opening a barn door of exceptions. He was just a one-off lunatic who chose to disobey the law? Well, so was Adam Lanza. It’s okay, ethically, to kill humans we don’t want? Thanks for legalizing capital punishment. Abortion is a Constitutional right and this ugliness is sometimes the cost we must bear? The Czar is on his way to conceal a dozen firearms on his personage.

No matter how the Left attempts to explain away Gosnell, the more they expose themselves as hypocrites. And they know it.

It is by no coincidence or obsession that the Czar mentions firearms in the same thought as abortion; as our own Ghettoputer sagely posited years ago, the Left can make no argument for abortion that does not undermine gun control arguments at the same time. But there is more: just as the Left is being forced to watched the horrors they allowed with abortion, they are being forced to admit that gun control does not work at the same time.

This is truly a dark age for the enlightened liberal religion: both abortion and gun control have been two of their biggest fetishes, and they are losing both. Their third hysteria—government control—is on very wobbly knees as well, given how much Americans are hearing and reacting to spending, debts, deficits, and control. And you only need to kick out one leg of a stool to make the whole thing collapse.

Why is the Czar not encouraged? Why a lack of optimism? After all, the big three pillars of modern progressive liberalism are cracked, crumbling, or tumbling.

Because the Czar knows that the Left will shortly realize they are cornered. And this won’t be pretty.

The Czar of Muscovy

Божію Поспѣшествующею Милостію Мы, Дима Грозный Императоръ и Самодержецъ Всероссiйскiй, цѣсарь Московскiй. The Czar was born in the steppes of Russia in 1267, and was cheated out of total control of all Russia upon the death of Boris Mikhailovich, who replaced Alexander Yaroslav Nevsky in 1263. However, in 1283, our Czar was passed over due to a clerical error and the rule of all Russia went to his second cousin Daniil (Даниил Александрович), whom Czar still resents. As a half-hearted apology, the Czar was awarded control over Muscovy, inconveniently located 5,000 miles away just outside Chicago. He now spends his time seething about this and writing about other stuff that bothers him.