Friday, August 31, 2012

DNC Speakers

GorT took a look at some of the speakers set for the DNC:

Sandra Fluke - so a 30-something law student who believes that free birth control for all should be a major platform issue for the Presidency is speaking.  Prediction: she's going to whine and complain and sound like a warped Alanis Morissette song....my apologies to Alanis Morissette.

Lilly Ledbetter, the namesake of the federal law requiring equal pay for equal work regardless of gender.  I wonder if she'll ask the DNC delegates to investigate why their candidate's campaign doesn't pay men and women staffers the same for the same level of work?  Probably not.  Maybe she'll ask the Senate Democrats why they don't pay their male and female staffers the same for the same level of work?  I doubt it.

Nancy Keenan, head of NARAL Pro-Choice America, will speak.  Maybe to defend why President Obama voted in favor of the partial-birth abortions four times while saying that he wants to find a middle ground.

Caroline Kennedy will speak - maybe to complain that the current set f democrats allowed Teddy's seat to be turned over to a Republican.  The horrors!  ELEVENTY!@!@$$!!@#

Eva Longoria will speak about something.  Maybe how awesome Desperate Housewives is...or was.  Or maybe how great she is in that new pick a flavor of Lay's Potato Chips ad.  Corndog?  Seriously?

It doesn't get much better...

The wooden-one, John Kerry will speak and Maryland's own Martin O'Malley, who unlike the republican governors that BG pointed out, took a state budget surplus from his Republican predecessor and now has us in a solid deficit.  Rahm Emanuel will be there to drop some F-bombs and curse at people. 

Both Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid will talk.  I can't wait for those two.  Pelosi will probably avoid defending the "most open, honest, and ethical Congress EVAH!" and Harry Reid will likely avoid anything budgetary as he hasn't passed on in over three years.

Clearly, the democrats are trying to draw a distinction between their platforms as it affects women.  While not of the fairer sex, GorT is pretty sure that the jobs and the economy are more important to women and the straight-talking, taking care of business type of women that the RNC featured.  Cases in point here.

Conventional Thinking

BG writes in.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who noticed this.

Tuesday night:

Ohio Governor Kasich: We balanced our budget and we cut taxes.

Wisconsin Governor Walker: We balanced our budget and we cut taxes.

Virginia Governor McDonnell: We balanced our budget and we cut taxes.

Wednesday night:

New Mexico Governor Martinez: We balanced our budget and we didn’t raise taxes.

Future Vice-President Ryan: Governor Romney balanced the Massachusetts budget and didn’t raise taxes.

Remember that next time your favorite leftist puzzlewit friend says we need to raise taxes on millionaires to balance the federal budget. Ask him what magic powers state governors (who, last I checked, can’t print money) have that the President of the United States of America  does not.

—BG
Well, you said it.

Love vs. Sex

Who would you rather have speak at your convention? Seriously!
h/t Conservative Facebook Friend

Thursday, August 30, 2012

They've got nothing else...

Flame on!

The Democrats are not going to be able to run on their record. Many are running away from Obamacare. The economy is not getting any better, and one can make the case that it is probably going to be worse before it gets better. The Senate hasn't passed a budget in well over 1000 days, so any attempts at calling Congress obstructive lands the nation's jaundiced eye squarely on Harry Reid and the gang. The remainder of Obama's policies have been a miserable failure or worse, patronage of pals.

So what will the remaining 70 or so days remaining running up to the election consist of?

Romney and Ryan and a host of Republican senate candidates in various key states will make the case for their election and the Democrats will keen like banshees calling them liars at every turn. There will be liars lying about Republican statements, policies, and plans. There will be lawyers parsing every sentence for interpretations, suppositions, speculations and conclusions, that by being speculative will be implicated as a lie.

'Liar' is the new 'Racist'...

You heard it here first, but you will be hearing it everyday, multiple times a day through the first week of November.

They've got nothing else to run on.

GOP's Best Night So Far

The Czar and the Царица watched last night’s convention speeches, missing only a couple for dinner and homework with the kids.

Thoughts:

Portman: Too much a campaign speech, knocking the President around. Look, everyone there knows Obama is a dud.

Huckabee: One thing the Czar agrees with most liberals on...when a politician tries to do standup comedy, he usually falls down.

Rice: Excellent speech, although her delivery seems to be getting strange. Perhaps it was nerves, but she seems to be developing a curious accent. Anyway, for our part, her best line—mind-blowing in its greater implications—was claiming the power of the teachers’ unions is the greatest civil rights crisis of our age. That’s heady, and brilliant rhetoric...and not incorrect, by the way. As she explained, we have reached a point where you can look at a student’s zip code and immediately know if he or she is going to succeed in life. Yeah, the speech was good (see GorT’s comments below), but this point really stood out.

Martinez: Yikes, where has the GOP been hiding her? The Governor delivered a geniunely warm, entertaining, and engaging speech, and our dear Царица said her speech will do more to win women to the Republican side than anything she has seen so far. Her psychology was brilliant: she is a woman, she is Hispanic, and she is smart enough to realize that the values of each of these three categories line up with Republicans far more than Democrats. A funny, enjoyable, and quite ingenious speech by her. Let us hope she remains in the public spotlight for years to come!

Ryan: Well, we better break this into two parts.

The Not-So-Good: Ryan started out stiff, wooden, and wild-eyed. His constant throat-clearing became a distraction, and he seemed to be reading of a screen. Not bad, but a mechanical delivery of canned material.

The Good: About a third of the way into his speech, Ryan got to where he wanted to be. And he delivered a fiery sermon about the President, repeatedly calling attention to the promises of candidate Obama to the petty, dismissive DMV his administration has now become. Finally, and perhaps too late for some viewers, he did what he does best—explain the financials of government, why the country is truly and genuinely in serious peril, and how there is just enough time to rescue it. Yes, he gets into numbers pretty heavily, but does so repeatedly in a direct way that anyone can follow.

The speech was hardly masterful, but it was worthy of any of Reagan’s best, actually. Wow, was all we kept saying. And the later it went, the more Ryan relaxed into who he really would be as a vice-president. And he lives up to the stereotype that Paul Ryan is a funny, witty, family man with deep beliefs and a rocket-fuel-powered intelligence.

Who on earth are the Democrats going to get as a Paul Ryan debate stand-in for Joe Biden? There isn’t anyone remotely associated with their campaign who can even imitate him.

RNC Thoughts

Many are going to focus on the Paul Ryan speech last night and don't get me wrong, Mrs. GorT and GorT watched the live coverage from Mike Huckabee's speech through Paul Ryan's speech.  Each speech was excellent but I'd like to focus on two in particular:  Condoleezza Rice and Susana Martinez.
There are a few themes running through the RNC but the one that running as an undercurrent and that both of these remarkable women demonstrate is that, as an American, you are not confined or restricted to a particular job, economic strata, or other classification label.  You have the power and opportunity to set forward towards your own destiny.  Hear it in their own words:


Condi RiceSusana Martinez
And on a personal note: A little girl grows up in Jim Crow Birmingham – the most segregated big city in America,” she said. “Her parents can’t take her to a movie theater or a restaurant, but they make her believe that even though she can’t have a hamburger at the Woolworth’s lunch counter, she can be President of the United States. And she becomes the Secretary of State.Growing up, I never imagined a girl from a border town could one day become a governor. But this is America. Y, en America todo es posible. My parents taught me to never give up and to always believe that my future could be whatever I dreamt it to be. Success, they taught me, is built on the foundation of courage, hard-work and individual responsibility.

Both women delivered great speeches, and I highly recommend that you go watch them - Condi Rice's is here and Susana Martinez' is here.  These women are examples and role models and, in the words of Gov. Martinez, "[they]'re Republicans!"

While I don't know if Dr. Rice is interested in taking any more politically-appointed or nominated roles and Gov. Martinez is doing a great job in New Mexicoand has a lot of potential ahead of her, both would be excellent choices for roles in a Romney-Ryan executive branch.  And I hope that the GOP doesn't lose sight of these two, their contributions, and their awesome potential to showcase the true power of being a free American.  Sure, we can go down the route that the Democrats would and classify them - minorities, Hispanic woman, African-American woman, etc.  We could even tout their beachheads for women and minorities:
  • first female governor of New Mexico
  • first female Hispanic governor in the United States
  • first female African-American Secretary of State
  • second African-American Secretary of State (after Colin Powell)
  • first female National Security Advisor

But that's not the point and the GOP wasn't out there touting that - because it was what they did as a person...not as a person of a certain class or status.

Finally, both echoed a second theme that is running through this convention and should be a prominent feature in the campaign against President Obama: his has not demonstrated leadership.


Condi RiceSusana Martinez
Then, in 2008, the global financial and economic crisis would stun us. And it still reverberates as we deal with unemployment and economic uncertainty and bad policies that cast a pall over an American economy and a recovery that is desperately needed at home and abroad. And we have seen -- we have seen that the desire for liberty and freedom is, indeed, universal, as men and women in the Middle East rise up to seize it. Yet, the promise of the Arab spring is engulfed in uncertainty, internal strife, and hostile neighbors our challenging the young, fragile democracy of Iraq. Dictators in Iran and Syria butcher their people and threat to regional security. Russia and China prevent a response, and everyone asks, where does America stand? Indeed -- indeed, that is the question of the hour. Where does America stand? You see when the friends or foes alike don't know the answer to that question, unambiguously and clearly, the world is likely to be a more dangerous and chaotic place. And I know too -- I know too there is a wariness. I know that it feels as if we have carried these burdens long enough. But we can only know that there is no choice, because one of two things will happen if we don't lead. Either no one will lead and there will be chaos, or someone will fill the vacuum who does not share our values. My fellow Americans, we do not have a choice. We cannot be reluctant to lead and you cannot lead from behind.In New Mexico, I inherited the largest structural deficit in state history, and our legislature is controlled by Democrats. We don't always agree, but we came together in a bipartisan manner and turned that deficit into a surplus. And we did it without raising taxes. But that is not the kind of leadership that we are seeing from President Obama. He promised to bring us all together, to cut unemployment, to pass immigration reform in his first year, and even promised to cut the deficit in half, in his first term. Do you remember that? But he hasn't come close. They have not even passed a budget in Washington, D.C. In 3 years.

These remarkable women get it.  They know the score.  They echo what others in and around Washington on both sides of the aisle have said publicly and privately: President Obama is not leading.  It's time for a change and I say we follow these women.  Not only in their support but in their examples of perseverance.  In the words of Calvin Coolidge (which I had hung on my wall in my bedroom):
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence.
Talent will not;
nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent.
Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb.  Education will not;
the world is filled with educated derelicts.
Perseverance and determination alone are omnipotent.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Paul Ryan's Vice Presidental Acceptance Speech


No need to guess who taught him that trick.
The Castle is in Wisconsin, after all...
Dr. J. was wow'ed by the speech. So much so he posted a link to the transcript on his Facebook page. He figures it is the kindest way for his lefty friends to purge themselves from his account so he doesn't have to. They have been disturbingly hateful of late. He has posted the speech in its entirety for our readers enjoyment. 
Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored by the support of this convention for vice president of the United States.
I accept the duty to help lead our nation out of a jobs crisis and back to prosperity – and I know we can do this.
I accept the calling of my generation to give our children the America that was given to us, with opportunity for the young and security for the old – and I know that we are ready.
Our nominee is sure ready. His whole life has prepared him for this moment – to meet serious challenges in a serious way, without excuses and idle words. After four years of getting the run-around, America needs a turnaround, and the man for the job is Governor Mitt Romney.
I'm the newcomer to the campaign, so let me share a first impression. I have never seen opponents so silent about their record, and so desperate to keep their power.
They've run out of ideas. Their moment came and went. Fear and division are all they've got left.
With all their attack ads, the president is just throwing away money – and he's pretty experienced at that. You see, some people can't be dragged down by the usual cheap tactics, because their ability, character, and plain decency are so obvious – and ladies and gentlemen, that is Mitt Romney.
For my part, your nomination is an unexpected turn. It certainly came as news to my family, and I'd like you to meet them: My wife Janna, our daughter Liza, and our boys Charlie and Sam.
The kids are happy to see their grandma, who lives in Florida. There she is – my Mom, Betty.
My Dad, a small-town lawyer, was also named Paul. Until we lost him when I was 16, he was a gentle presence in my life. I like to think he'd be proud of me and my sister and brothers, because I'm sure proud of him and of where I come from, Janesville, Wisconsin.
I live on the same block where I grew up. We belong to the same parish where I was baptized. Janesville is that kind of place.
The people of Wisconsin have been good to me. I've tried to live up to their trust. And now I ask those hardworking men and women, and millions like them across America, to join our cause and get this country working again.
When Governor Romney asked me to join the ticket, I said, "Let's get this done" – and that isexactly, what we're going to do.
President Barack Obama came to office during an economic crisis, as he has reminded us a time or two. Those were very tough days, and any fair measure of his record has to take that into account. My home state voted for President Obama. When he talked about change, many people liked the sound of it, especially in Janesville, where we were about to lose a major factory.
A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: "I believe that if our government is there to support you ... this plant will be here for another hundred years." That's what he said in 2008.
Well, as it turned out, that plant didn't last another year. It is locked up and empty to this day. And that's how it is in so many towns today, where the recovery that was promised is nowhere in sight.
Right now, 23 million men and women are struggling to find work. Twenty-three million people, unemployed or underemployed. Nearly one in six Americans is living in poverty. Millions of young Americans have graduated from college during the Obama presidency, ready to use their gifts and get moving in life. Half of them can't find the work they studied for, or any work at all.
So here's the question: Without a change in leadership, why would the next four years be any different from the last four years?
The first troubling sign came with the stimulus. It was President Obama's first and best shot at fixing the economy, at a time when he got everything he wanted under one-party rule. It cost $831 billion – the largest one-time expenditure ever by our federal government.
It went to companies like Solyndra, with their gold-plated connections, subsidized jobs, and make-believe markets. The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal.
What did the taxpayers get out of the Obama stimulus? More debt. That money wasn't just spent and wasted – it was borrowed, spent, and wasted.
Maybe the greatest waste of all was time. Here we were, faced with a massive job crisis – so deep that if everyone out of work stood in single file, that unemployment line would stretch the length of the entire American continent. You would think that any president, whatever his party, would make job creation, and nothing else, his first order of economic business.
But this president didn't do that. Instead, we got a long, divisive, all-or-nothing attempt to put the federal government in charge of health care.
Obamacare comes to more than two thousand pages of rules, mandates, taxes, fees, and fines that have no place in a free country.
The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over. That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare.
And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly.
You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn't have enough money. They needed more. They needed hundreds of billions more. So, they just took it all away from Medicare. Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn't even ask for. The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we're going to stop it.
In Congress, when they take out the heavy books and wall charts about Medicare, my thoughts go back to a house on Garfield Street in Janesville. My wonderful grandma, Janet, had Alzheimer's and moved in with Mom and me. Though she felt lost at times, we did all the little things that made her feel loved.
We had help from Medicare, and it was there, just like it's there for my Mom today. Medicare is a promise, and we will honor it. A Romney-Ryan administration will protect and strengthen Medicare, for my Mom's generation, for my generation, and for my kids and yours.
So our opponents can consider themselves on notice. In this election, on this issue, the usual posturing on the Left isn't going to work. Mitt Romney and I know the difference between protecting a program, and raiding it. Ladies and gentlemen, our nation needs this debate. We want this debate. We will win this debate.
Obamacare, as much as anything else, explains why a presidency that began with such anticipation now comes to such a disappointing close.
It began with a financial crisis; it ends with a job crisis.
It began with a housing crisis they alone didn't cause; it ends with a housing crisis they didn't correct.
It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.
It all started off with stirring speeches, Greek columns, the thrill of something new. Now all that's left is a presidency adrift, surviving on slogans that already seem tired, grasping at a moment that has already passed, like a ship trying to sail on yesterday's wind.
President Obama was asked not long ago to reflect on any mistakes he might have made. He said, well, "I haven't communicated enough." He said his job is to "tell a story to the American people" – as if that's the whole problem here? He needs to talk more, and we need to be better listeners?
Ladies and gentlemen, these past four years we have suffered no shortage of words in the White House. What's missing is leadership in the White House. And the story that Barack Obama does tell, forever shifting blame to the last administration, is getting old. The man assumed office almost four years ago – isn't it about time he assumed responsibility?
In this generation, a defining responsibility of government is to steer our nation clear of a debt crisis while there is still time. Back in 2008, candidate Obama called a $10 trillion national debt "unpatriotic" – serious talk from what looked to be a serious reformer.
Yet by his own decisions, President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him, and more than all the troubled governments of Europe combined. One president, one term, $5 trillion in new debt.
He created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report. He thanked them, sent them on their way, and then did exactly nothing.
Republicans stepped up with good-faith reforms and solutions equal to the problems. How did the president respond? By doing nothing – nothing except to dodge and demagogue the issue.
So here we are, $16 trillion in debt and still he does nothing. In Europe, massive debts have put entire governments at risk of collapse, and still he does nothing. And all we have heard from this president and his team are attacks on anyone who dares to point out the obvious.
They have no answer to this simple reality: We need to stop spending money we don't have.
My Dad used to say to me: "Son. You have a choice: You can be part of the problem, or you can be part of the solution." The present administration has made its choices. And Mitt Romney and I have made ours: Before the math and the momentum overwhelm us all, we are going to solve this nation's economic problems.
And I'm going to level with you: We don't have that much time. But if we are serious, and smart, and we lead, we can do this.
After four years of government trying to divide up the wealth, we will get America creating wealth again. With tax fairness and regulatory reform, we'll put government back on the side of the men and women who create jobs, and the men and women who need jobs.
My Mom started a small business, and I've seen what it takes. Mom was 50 when my Dad died. She got on a bus every weekday for years, and rode 40 miles each morning to Madison. She earned a new degree and learned new skills to start her small business. It wasn't just a new livelihood. It was a new life. And it transformed my Mom from a widow in grief to a small businesswoman whose happiness wasn't just in the past. Her work gave her hope. It made our family proud. And to this day, my Mom is my role model.
Behind every small business, there's a story worth knowing. All the corner shops in our towns and cities, the restaurants, cleaners, gyms, hair salons, hardware stores – these didn't come out of nowhere. A lot of heart goes into each one. And if small businesspeople say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place. Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at five in the morning. Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them. After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn't help to hear from their president that government gets the credit. What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that.
We have a plan for a stronger middle class, with the goal of generating 12 million new jobs over the next four years.
In a clean break from the Obama years, and frankly from the years before this president, we will keep federal spending at 20 percent of GDP, or less. That is enough. The choice is whether to put hard limits on economic growth, or hard limits on the size of government, and we choose to limit government.
I learned a good deal about economics, and about America, from the author of the Reagan tax reforms – the great Jack Kemp. What gave Jack that incredible enthusiasm was his belief in the possibilities of free people, in the power of free enterprise and strong communities to overcome poverty and despair. We need that same optimism right now.
And in our dealings with other nations, a Romney-Ryan administration will speak with confidence and clarity. Wherever men and women rise up for their own freedom, they will know that the American president is on their side. Instead of managing American decline, leaving allies to doubt us and adversaries to test us, we will act in the conviction that the United States is still the greatest force for peace and liberty that this world has ever known.
President Obama is the kind of politician who puts promises on the record, and then calls that the record. But we are four years into this presidency. The issue is not the economy as Barack Obama inherited it, not the economy as he envisions it, but this economy as we are living it.
College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life. Everyone who feels stuck in the Obama economy is right to focus on the here and now. And I hope you understand this too, if you're feeling left out or passed by: You have not failed, your leaders have failed you.
None of us have to settle for the best this administration offers – a dull, adventureless journey from one entitlement to the next, a government-planned life, a country where everything is free but us.
Listen to the way we're spoken to already, as if everyone is stuck in some class or station in life, victims of circumstances beyond our control, with government there to help us cope with our fate.
It's the exact opposite of everything I learned growing up in Wisconsin, or at college in Ohio. When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life. I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself. That's what we do in this country. That's the American Dream. That's freedom, and I'll take it any day over the supervision and sanctimony of the central planners.
By themselves, the failures of one administration are not a mandate for a new administration. A challenger must stand on his own merits. He must be ready and worthy to serve in the office of president.
We're a full generation apart, Governor Romney and I. And, in some ways, we're a little different. There are the songs on his iPod, which I've heard on the campaign bus and on many hotel elevators. He actually urged me to play some of these songs at campaign rallies. I said, I hope it's not a deal-breaker Mitt, but my playlist starts with AC/DC, and ends with Zeppelin.
A generation apart. That makes us different, but not in any of the things that matter. Mitt Romney and I both grew up in the heartland, and we know what places like Wisconsin and Michigan look like when times are good, when people are working, when families are doing more than just getting by. And we both know it can be that way again.
We've had very different careers – mine mainly in public service, his mostly in the private sector. He helped start businesses and turn around failing ones. By the way, being successful in business – that's a good thing.
Mitt has not only succeeded, but succeeded where others could not. He turned around the Olympics at a time when a great institution was collapsing under the weight of bad management, overspending, and corruption – sounds familiar, doesn't it?
He was the Republican governor of a state where almost nine in ten legislators are Democrats, and yet he balanced the budget without raising taxes. Unemployment went down, household incomes went up, and Massachusetts, under Mitt Romney, saw its credit rating upgraded.
Mitt and I also go to different churches. But in any church, the best kind of preaching is done by example. And I've been watching that example. The man who will accept your nomination tomorrow is prayerful and faithful and honorable. Not only a defender of marriage, he offers an example of marriage at its best. Not only a fine businessman, he's a fine man, worthy of leading this optimistic and good-hearted country.
Our different faiths come together in the same moral creed. We believe that in every life there is goodness; for every person, there is hope. Each one of us was made for a reason, bearing the image and likeness of the Lord of Life.
We have responsibilities, one to another – we do not each face the world alone. And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak. The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves.
Each of these great moral ideas is essential to democratic government – to the rule of law, to life in a humane and decent society. They are the moral creed of our country, as powerful in our time, as on the day of America's founding. They are self-evident and unchanging, and sometimes, even presidents need reminding, that our rights come from nature and God, not from government.
The founding generation secured those rights for us, and in every generation since, the best among us have defended our freedoms. They are protecting us right now. We honor them and all our veterans, and we thank them.
The right that makes all the difference now, is the right to choose our own leaders. And you are entitled to the clearest possible choice, because the time for choosing is drawing near. So here is our pledge.
We will not duck the tough issues, we will lead.
We will not spend four years blaming others, we will take responsibility.
We will not try to replace our founding principles, we will reapply our founding principles.
The work ahead will be hard. These times demand the best of us – all of us, but we can do this. Together, we can do this.
We can get this country working again. We can get this economy growing again. We can make the safety net safe again. We can do this.
Whatever your political party, let's come together for the sake of our country. Join Mitt Romney and me. Let's give this effort everything we have. Let's see this through all the way. Let's get this done.
Thank you, and God bless.

Twittering While Rome Burns...

...or at least while New Orleans sinks.

I have the TOZT-7 and I'm coming to get you Mandy!
Governor Jindal could not be reached for comment. He's still on hold with the White House...

Winning!

Amy Payne over at the Heritage Foundation penned a post today that breaks down how well the President's "plan" has worked.  According to the latest Obama campaign ad featuring former President Bill Clinton, President Obama's plan is working and needs to continue because it worked under Clinton.

Whoa, is anyone else's mind spinning?

First, Ms. Payne's piece.  She briefly examines three areas that are the top struggles reported by small businesses in a National Federation of Independent Business study:  taxation, regulation, and poor sales.  Go read it. A few highlights:
  • Ernst & Young estimates that President Obama's tax hike would kill about 710,000 jobs and cause real wages to drop
  • In his first three years, 106 new regulations were added costing more than $46B per year in new costs for Americans
  • Struggling sales (remember how all of us need to start buying more to help the economy but we're going to get more taxes) are being driven by the higher unemployment and higher fuel costs

Great.  While some out there have welcomed their new incompetent overlord*, I think the rest of us are ready for some real hope and change.  Maybe President Obama is all hopped up on the Tiger's Blood with Charlie Sheen and hanging out at the Anger Management after parties.

* - the only overlords worth welcoming are us, of course and zombies.  Just don't eat the bath salts.

Mailbag: Rootsy Blues Edition

Ask and ye shall receive! The Royal Mathematician spake (speaks? spoke? spokes? Spokane?) regarding the Great Square Root of Eleventy Schism of 2012:

O Bringer of the Force-Lightning:

Here’s the real mathematical scoop on the square root of eleventy:

Pretty much everything has a square root *if* you put it into a big enough mathematical structure (and if you know what “multiplication” means in that structure).  2 has no square root in the integers (or in the rational numbers), but if you consider the integers to be a subset of the real numbers, then it does.  -1 has no square root in the reals either, but it does if you consider the reals as a subset of the complex numbers, etc.  In fact, most objects have more than one square root.  As Dr. J correctly notes, we usually think of the ± ambiguity as an inherent part of taking a square root.  What is less well known is that some sorts of objects have more than 2 square roots. 

For example, the 2 x 2 matrix
1318
-6-8
 has four square roots, even among the 2 x 2 matrices with integer coefficients, namely:


56
-2-2
-11-18
610
1118
-6-10

and

-5-6
22



I think I can say with some confidence then, that the square root of eleventy exists, but figuring out what, precisely, it is (and, indeed, how many of them there are) awaits a more precise definition of “eleventy.”

Using the LOTR definition of eleventy as 110 (as in, “[Bilbo] announced that he would shortly be celebrating his eleventy-first birthday”) we of course arrive at the square root of eleventy as ±10.488088481701515469914535136799375984752718576815… (more or less).  But, if we take eleventy as being (as Dr. J suggests) a random string of exclamation points, then I would argue that there are four possible meanings for the square-root of eleventy, namely, ± half-as-long-a-string-of-exclamation-points, followed by an optional square-root of a single exclamation point to allow for the possibility that the original string had an odd number of points (here, of course, “multiplication” is “catenation of strings”).

On the other (third?) hand, the ever-popular Urban Dictionary gives several possible definitions for eleventy, including “an infinite string of ones.”  It’s unclear how to operate with this particular definition without using a number base other than 10 – if we work in binary (GorT’s favorite), then this actually has a reasonable meaning as a 2-adic number.  These are strange critters (invented by Kurt Hensel in the early part of the 20thcentury) that look like real numbers, except that the infinite expansion is on the left instead of the right (and they only exist when the “base” is prime).  In fact, surprisingly, “eleventy” is equal to -1 in this case.  Now, -1 happens to have no square root in the 2-adic numbers themselves, but the universe of 2-adic numbers can be expanded to include one, just as in the case of square roots of negative real numbers.  On the other (fourth?) hand, if we use base-3 arithmetic and the 3-adic numbers, then “eleventy” is equal to -1/2 and it (surprisingly) has two square roots in the 3-adic numbers, namely, …211120210010210212011102122121 and …011102012212012010211120100102.  In the 5-adic numbers (the fifth hand?), eleventy also has two natural square roots, …320433202142434042334013440331 and …124011242302010402110431004114.  Your Royal Mathematician grew weary of this exercise before calculating the square root of eleventy in the 7-adic and 11-adic numbers (although they do exist, and eleventy in base 11 does have a certain aesthetic appeal).

Somehow, though, I doubt that any of this is what the Czar meant, and probably more than any of your readers (if, indeed, any have made it this far) ever wanted to know…

Grovelingly yours,
--Dr. (KN)J,
Royal Mathematician to the Gormogons.

P.S. - All of The Czar's other observations are spot on.

Czar? Is any of this what you meant?

Picking Cherries

Here is a really easy way to tick off a pro-AGW enthusiast: tell him that this winter is expected to be the coldest on record, or that we haven’t had nearly the amount of hurricanes predicted.

You then get a curt lecture on why weather isn’t climate. Yes, you can expect these sorts of events. It is the overall trend you need to watch, and not day-to-day anecdotes. Because, otherwise, you’re just cherry-picking.

That’s fair, you say, just like you can’t say a hungover freshman is perfectly healthy between vomiting heaves.

But then you notice all sorts of stories in the press, popular media, and other venues who describe how yesterday’s drought, tomorrow’s super-hot weather, or that EF4 tornado that hit a county up North are all examples of increasing warming weather.

Wait a moment, you think. Isn’t that the same thing as cherry picking data? Why can’t you use an example of a cold day in Phoenix as an example, while they can use a flood in Bangor? And indeed, you are right. Cherry picking is picking cherries, regardless of which side believes a monopoly on truth.

However, you must note a critical difference: it isn’t scientific establishment doing this, necessarily: you see this pro-AGW cherry-picking from the non-scientists in the Main Stream Media, the Al Gores, the street-corner prophets, the Progressives, and the commenters on websites.

No, the real scientists ought to be producing long-term trend data, analyzing large amounts of variable sources of evidence, and double-checking and triple-checking weather stations.

The problem is of course that while many scientists are doing just that, the signal-to-noise ratio is terribly high thanks to the clowns who think they’re helping. Hint: they aren’t helping.

If something is happening to our climate—and evidence says there ought to be—we need less noise. Less noise from the politicians, who go from 1° rise in average temperature to a thousand-page Cap and Trade bill in days. Less noise from the grant takers, who know that a wiggle in a barometer can mean another year or two of employment. Less noise from the smiling models on the weather updates, who may not realize their hairspray alone could be pumping billions of cubic pounds of CO2 into the air. Less noise from the wannabe science geeks, who are certain that their dogs’s early shedding is the absolute proof the Republicans are covering up.

Let us determine if there is a problem, and only then decide on a solution.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

NYT: Racist Republicans Target Chocolate City With Uncontrollable Weather Phenomenon!

Republicans use their mastery of weather
(along with space and time) to direct a storm
as big as Texas to destroy their dark-skinned
enemies in the Chocolate City.  Or so the
New York Times believes.
If one's reading list were limited to the New York Times' editorial page, one could be forgiven his erroneous belief that Republicans were omniscient, omnipotent malevolent beings who used their centuries-long total control of government to destroy poor, downtrodden minorities. Today's editorial regarding now-Hurricane Isaac would do nothing to disabuse one of such beliefs.

Our liberal betters and setters of the agenda for lazy liberal newsies continue their brakeless descent into madness with two massive lies in the opening paragraph.
Tropical Storm Isaac is more than just a logistical inconvenience for Republicans gathered in Tampa: it is a powerful reminder both of Republican incompetence in handling Hurricane Katrina seven years ago, and the party’s no-less-disastrous plans to further cut emergency-related spending.
Let's take a look at New York Times editorial board's noxious falsehoods one by one.

1.  Republicans Incompetently Handled Hurricane Katrina

False.  Republicans were not incompetent in responding to Hurricane Katrina.  Rather, it was the Democrats who failed.  It is the states, not the federal government, that is primarily responsible for the safety and well-being of their citizens during natural disasters. 

When Katrina laid waste to New Orleans in 2005, Louisiana had a Democrat governor (the inept Kathleen Blanco, the direct result of corrupt Democrat cronyism and nepotism) and New Orleans had a Democrat mayor (the inept Ray Nagin, he of "Chocolate City" fame).  Gov. Blanco's career was undone by her weak response, and portions of Mayor Nagin's New Orleans are uninhabited and uninhabitable to this day.  It wasn't Republicans or George W. Bush or FEMA who made the decision not to force evacuation of New Orleans' below sea level areas as it became increasingly apparent that New Orleans was screwed.  It wasn't the RNC or the mysterious Koch brothers who determined the best place to leave school buses intended for evacuation was in a flood-prone location, guaranteeing their unnecessary destruction.  It was the state and local machine-dominated Democrats who made flawed decision after flawed decision, failing to do their most basic of jobs: protect their citizens.

"But what about FEMA, 'Puter?!? It was all BUSHITLERBURTON'Z FAWLT!!1!!!1eleventy!!1!", 'Puter hears the frothy mouthed unshaven hippies chanting from their drum circles and macrame collectives. W hat about FEMA, indeed.

Could George W. Bush's FEMA have been more responsive to Louisiana and Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina struck?  Probably.  But presidents have remarkably little influence on agencies below the political appointee level. A federal agency is just as incompetent under a Democrat president as it is under a Republican president, and no amount of wishing will make it otherwise. Do you really need examples?

The New York Times also conveniently omits telling its readers that FEMA is not actually intended to do anything during an actual disaster; that's the states' job.  Before disasters strike, FEMA provides guidance and funds to state and local governments so as to permit these local authorities to prepare adequately their jurisdictions and populace for disasters.  After disasters, FEMA provides grants and loans to states, municipalities and citizens affected so that they may clean up and rebuild.  FEMA cannot force states and municipalities to take its assistance or to heed its warnings, nor should it have the power to do so.

2.  Republicans Are Cutting Funding To FEMA So As To Endanger Americans

False.  FEMA's funding markedly increased after 9/11, as America clamored for government to provide a greater security blanket, even though government cannot ever adequately protect us, no matter how much money we throw at the problem.

In the 2001 fiscal year (ending 9/30/01), the taxpayers funded FEMA to the tune of approximately $3.6 billion.  This year, FEMA's asking the taxpayers to pony up approximately $13.6 billion.  'Puter's no math genius, but even he knows that's an increase in the neighborhood of 378%.  These numbers exclude Department of Homeland Security funding which is often lumped into FEMA's allocation, and also disaster-specific outlays.

To further elucidate 'Puter's point, let's posit a hypothetical.  Assume that FEMA's funding only increased at the average inflation rate from 2001 through 2011, which rate is 2.46%.  If those assumptions held, FEMA's budget today would be about $4.7 billion.  Even if 'Puter assumes a very generous 6.00% annual return on FEMA's original budget and compounds the return, FEMA's budget today would still be only $6.85 billion.  To get from FEMA's 2001 budget to FEMA's 2013 request requires a 12.85% rate of return, more than five times greater than the rate of inflation.

Even the Obama Administration thinks FEMA's gotten plenty of money, as its fiscal year 2013 budget request for FEMA is less than its 2012 actual outlay.

The New York Times editorial board thinks you're stupid.  So stupid that you will believe that reining in an agency that has increased its spending at a rate more than five times that of historical inflation is somehow underfunded, placing you in imminent peril.

'Puter would delight in continuing his depantsing his liberal betters over at the New York Times, pointing out their inability to comprehend basic math, but 'Puter's bored and ... SQUIRREL!

Number Theory

Behold, the square root of eleventy.
Look upon it and despair!
Today, The Czar, English major and Castle Grammarian, wrote:
5. There is no square root of eleventy.
Now correct Dr. J. if he is wrong (specifically Dr. J. is asking GorT and our Royal Mathematician Dr. (KN)J, but Dr. J. thinks he knows the truth regarding this matter.

The square root of eleventy is:

Positive or negative i-leventy!

Dr. J. is glad that all of those theoretical math classes at Ivy University were finally able to be put to good use!

BREAKING: Issac Speech Leaked!

In all seriousness, the residents of the Gulf Coast are in his prayers and
he wishes the storm to be no less than what you see above. He was 
caught in Hurricane Belle back in 1976 and that was a storm!

Gentle Readers,

2-1B has done it again. He has hacked the POTUS's TOTUS* so that your Gormogons can provide to you a transcript of today's speech:

My fellow Americans, 

I come before you today, because on the seventh anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, the Gulf Coast, especially Democrat leaning Louisiana is is facing the spectre of Hurricane Isaac†. Isaac is bearing down on our precious gulf coast. Indeed, Isacc is arriving early, so that I am not able to make this speech in prime time, but that does allow me to show that I am out in front of this storm. But let me be clear, the mistakes of the past. Mistakes caused with malice by the Republicans during the Bush administration will not happen this time around. We have been working closely with Mayor Landreu to insure your safety. And despite Governor Jindal's rancor, FEMA is prepared to come in and offer any and all assistance necessary. It was my administration, with our stimulus program, that has shored up your levies. Without this funding for this shovel-ready program, which Vice Presidental Paul Ryan voted against, the Ninth Ward, along with much of New Orleans, would still be underwater, an abandoned city with no hope, nor any change.

During this time, when the Republicans are confirming their nominee in tony Tampa Florida, I would like to see this celebration of their partisan rancor, anger and hate end as we rally around our beloved New Orleanians, black and white, rich and poor, gay and straight, who are directly in harms way. Their convention is ill timed, and it is insensitive to the poor New Orleanians that they celebrate when their Gulf Coast neighbors are about the be devastated by Hurricane Issac. 

We are one America today, and as such, I am calling on the Republicans to put aside the politics of division and in the name of unity, cancel their convention, and roll up their sleeves to help the New Orleanians with the recovery after the storm. 

It is my hope that rather than continue to divide us in the wake of the storm, that the Republicans will stop their campaigning for the White House, and that Governor Romney, as wealthy as he is, contribute the entirety of his campaign coffers to the rebuilding. Indeed, it would be best if he step aside as the nominee, so that I can build on the progress of my first term and rebuild New Orleans and New America in the vision that we all share. 

Thank you and remember who cared the most about you when it is time to vote in November.

* Teleprompter Of The United States of America
† Tropical Storm, Hurricane they're just 'labels.' 

Math! Proof the Most Astonishing Facts You Enjoy

The Czar loves math as much as you don’t. Here are some fun facts to astonish and amaze your pets.
  1. The number four is the only number with as many letters as its quantity stipulates. Which is good, because if that were true for 427, it would take some time to spell.
  2. Lots of people memorize pi to umpteen places (your Czar, for example), but very few people bother with the square root of, say, three. So memorize the first couple of digits, like 1.73, and then make up a whole bunch of random numbers for about 20 minutes. Almost no one will call you on it, despite being totally impressed with you.
  3. Another thing to fool people with: tell them “And weirder still is square root of five.” Tell them it starts with 2.23, and then recite your home telephone number, with area code, then your cell phone number with area code. Then tell them your home number and cell phone number to freak them out like one of those bullshit Lincoln-Kennedy conspiracies, and ask them what the odds are both your phone numbers are found in the square root of five. By the way, if your home and cell phone numbers really are (606) 797-7499 and (789) 696-4091, you’re pretty awesome.
  4. Sometimes iTunes launches itself for no reason whatsoever, even when we are typing something, and it is irritating to no end.
  5. There is no square root of eleventy.
  6. Remember hearing that the sum of the interior angles of a triange must add up to 180°? Sure you do. But it is not always true in non-Euclidian space. No, we are not making this up. There exist triangles who interior sums add up to 270°. For example, take a globe and note where Greenwich and the Equator meet, just off Africa. Than angle is 90° Now look at the place off South America where the Equator meets -90°. Follow the lines of longitude up to the North Pole and measure that angle. Yep: 90°. And that’s a triangle, is it not?
  7. Nearly all of the bizarre math tricks where you select a number at random, do this, do that, and your number is seven (or whatever) work the same way. It is all verbal algebra. The steps basically get you to a control number, so that no matter what you pick, the answer will be the same. The next time you see one of those challenges (the Czar’s mother is happy to email you several a week), see if you can spot where the control number is introduced. In its simplest form—itself a popular joke among math fans—you see it as “Pick a number, add 1, subtract 1...and there’s your original number!” Or, “Pick a number. Double it. Divide by the original number. The number is...two!” That sort of thing.
See? Math even ‘Puter can appreciate!

Monday, August 27, 2012

A Word about Energy



Last week Mitt Romney released his energy plan should he be elected to office in November. It consists  deregulating the heavily regulated petroleum and nuclear industries and opening publicly owned sites to facilitate the tapping into American and North American resources.

In addition, he plans on supporting so-called alternative energy sources buy providing grants to basic research, and using the ARPA-E mechanism for such grants (think DARPA which is a hugely successful program).

Of course his policies were met with criticism by Francisco Peña, the former energy secretary under President Clinton. In the NYT, he is quoted as saying, "We will never reach energy independence by turning our backs on homegrown renewable energy and better auto mileage."

Here's the deal, energy is the life's blood of the economy. As energy is required for all things, cheap energy is perhaps the biggest stimulus to the economy. Fossil fuels are necessary for moving things around and nuclear energy is a very cost effective and, to be frank, safe source of electrical power. If we can lower our energy costs by moving towards energy independence (from fossil fuel harvested by OPEC, Venezuela and other unsavory characters) that's great. Even if the cost break point of true energy independence is about the same, that is also a good thing because we aren't beholden to political instability in foreign nations and our businesses can have an easier time projecting costs.

Also, Dr. J. has read up on the theories revolving around climate change, finds the whole man-made CO2 as a pollutant as a bit preposterous. He isn't saying that there hasn't been some element of global warming, but he has trouble swallowing that we are doing enough to cause it, and if we are, there are certainly far worse actors than the US. That doesn't mean that Dr. J. wants a smokestack in every pot, but he thinks the pendulum has swung too far to the Sierra Club/EPA left and we are tying two hands behind our back when it is reasonable to tie the left ring finger and pinky back, at the most.

Obama's energy policy of picking winners and losers based on what types of energy feel good to him, rather than economics has resulted in $4 gas and Solyndraesque boondoggles. A free market approach would have probably driven us closer to $2.50 gas and fewer dollars wasted on boondoggles that would have collapsed on their own sooner.

Obama's energy policy has pinched Dr. J.'s pocket a little, but it has hurt his nurses, techs, and custodial staff even more. They tend to live farther away from New Atlantis Ivory Tower Medical Center than Dr. J. and his physician colleagues do, and they earn less than Dr. J. does, so high gas prices and electric bills make it harder for them to enjoy the fruits of their hard work, pushing them towards a more subsistence lifestyle. The more subsistence living Americans do, the more it cripples economic recovery. Circle of economic life and all...

Alternative energy sources are a wonderful thing, but they aren't ready for primetime. And to be perfectly honest, they are, at present, a LUXURY, not a necessity. So to all of you progressives, sitting in your posh salons, imposing your notions of how things should be are as gauche as Marie Antoinette saying, "Let them eat cake." Except in your case it's saying, "Let them eat Solar wafers..."

Don't get him started on public transportation...it doesn't work everywhere and public transportation as a sustainable industry is a myth. The rare exception proves the rule. What works in NYC (at horrendous subsidization) won't work in the big square states.

As necessity is the mother of invention, there will come a time when alternative sources will surpass best current sources, but crippling the ability to obtain current sources and propping up alternative sources will not get you there sooner.

If you want to pay extra on your electrical bill, for green sources, good for you. If you want to drive a Prius (though Dr. J. will argue to the grave that the carbon footprint of the Imperial Shuttle is far smaller given your battery and all of the transport of parts and raw materials and disposal issues). If you can afford to go geothermal or solar to decrease your carbon footprint as you build your next house, that's your thing. Geothermal is a very smart longterm plan, but expensive upfront. Just don't cast the evil eye on your neighbor who cannot afford to do so. With growing environmental regulations on businesses, and 3 1/2 years of an energy hostile energy policy by the Obama administration, our recovery has been at a crawl and businesses and individuals are struggling.

If we have an energy policy that sets goals that reasonably balance the tensions between cheap, safe and independent we will be well on our way to recovery. Presently we've confused safe with none and that has to change or we are doomed as a nation.

President "It's All About Me" Obama

Does anyone else hear "me, me, me, all me, when Obama talks?
@SooperMexican noted his recent blog post over on Twitter and I clicked through to see the details.  It's worth reiterating here as it is a theme of the current President and/or his administration that we've noted here before.

As we all know, Neil Armstrong passed away last week.  Heartfelt messages, tributes, and other remembrances were shared by many.  Of course, one would expect the President to issue a message about it and sure enough he (or his PR folks) did.  Follow along.

Neil's spirit of discovery lives on in all the men and women who have devoted their lives to exploring the unknown -- including those who are ensuring that we reach higher and go further in space.  That legacy will endure -- sparked by a man who taught us the enormous power of one small step.

Along with that quote, a picture of a silouetted Obama looking up at an evening sky with a crescent Moon and Venus is shown. Click here to see it via SooperMexican's post. Sooper goes on to ponder whether some staffer wrote the post and whether the picture was taken for the statement on Armstrong's passing. His words are priceless:
I wonder if he had some pimply-faced staffer in his twenties write this for him. Did he go out and take a special picture, or just use a stock photo? Maybe that’s not even him and they photoshopped some dumbo ears onto a picture of some other guy…
So SooperMexican did some research and found that it is a stock photo of Obama that is on his Flickr account that was taken on April 24th, 2012. 

Seriously?  The President made a decent press release statement but then sullied it with this Tumblr post.

Basketball, Or More Sweaty Men...

Turns out that James Naismith made eight pages of notes about the very first game of basketball.

You can read a transcript of them, as well. The Czar particularly liked this paragraph:
Of course, should basketball ever accept a three-point play, it will become incumbent on the defense to foul the player immediately, thereby limiting him to a two-point free-throw shot. To prevent this, the offense should retaliate by attempting a three-point play with every offensive drive. Regrettably, this will almost surely result in a pointless, drawn-out engagement in which the game will consist of nothing more than three-point attempts coupled with intentional fouls that result in an endless parade of free throws. Let us sincerely hope no three-point concept ever evolves in the game, or it will quickly become pointless showboating, filled with lights and noise and ultimately boring the viewers.
History. You just can’t make this stuff up.

This Isn't Funny At All

You know, it isn’t just ‘Puter who can post tasteless crap like this.


This is severely unfunny. Not a redeeming thing about this at all. Total immaturity, and exploiting the last socially tolerated form of gross prejudice: making fun of fat kids. If you thought this was in any way funny, you should feel very guilty. Just like we did.

Hat tip to The Feral Irishman.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

An Obama with Nothing to Lose

Dr. J.'s WSJ sweetheart wrote this column last week. Reading it should be enough to get any freedom loving American out to vote:

Just as important are the things Mr. Obama will not do. His record gives no indication he will revive America's leadership in free trade. Nor is he likely to restore America's influence in the international arena. And so we will inch closer to a nuclear-armed Iran and the threats that the regime will pose to international peace and order. 

None of this is hyperbole. Mr. Obama is open about his tax aims, is proud of his spending and has never apologized for his regulatory ambitions. Despite a shellacking in the midterms, he moved left, and a November victory will reinforce his sense that he was correct to do so.

In other words, a President who's taken one step backwards occasionally while waiting to move two steps forward to achieve his goals will push harder in a second term where has has nothing to worry about, including the prospects of his VP candidate's run in 2016.

 President Obama has a vision for America and has how qualms about doing whatever he can as the chief executive to achieve his goals. Congress has been loath to fight him too hard when he over reaches out of fear of backlash against them for being even an appropriate check and balance.

 Enjoy.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

RIP Neil Armstrong

The first man on the moon, Neil Armstrong, has passed away.


He defines himself not as a hero or an icon, but rather a nerd:
The notoriously publicity shy Armstrong was a reluctant hero. In an era of celebrity adulation, Armstrong refused to sign autographs or grant interviews, giving only infrequent speeches. "I don't want a living memorial,'' he once said. He reluctantly joined fellow Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins in anniversary celebrations of the moon landing.
Armstrong flew Navy fighter jets during the Korean War, flying nearly 80 missions and later became a test pilot before joining the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its second group of astronauts. Armstrong commanded Gemini 8 in 1966, which suffered near disaster until he used a back-up system to stop an uncontrolled capsule spin and made an emergency landing in the Pacific Ocean.
Armstrong's prowess was again demonstrated following the moon landing, when it was later revealed that lunar module had just 20 seconds of fuel left when he steered to avoid large boulders before touching down in the Sea of Tranquility. The self-described nerd downplayed hero status.
"I am, and ever will be, a white socks, pocket protector, nerdy engineer," he said a February 2000 appearance. "And I take a substantial amount of pride in the accomplishments of my profession."